PDA

View Full Version : Nazis Invade India


ConfederateFly
January 25th, 2004, 01:00 AM
What would happen if Rommel succeds in North Africa then meets up with supplies and reinforcements in southern Russia and proceeds to India what will happen?

panzerjay
January 25th, 2004, 03:31 AM
have fun fun fun
til daddy takes the T bird away
:cool:

Abdul Hadi Pasha
January 25th, 2004, 04:16 AM
What would happen if Rommel succeds in North Africa then meets up with supplies and reinforcements in southern Russia and proceeds to India what will happen?

Exactly how would he get to India? Check a map, you'll find India is pretty freakin' far from Libya.

RMG
January 25th, 2004, 04:20 AM
Aboard thousands of massive zeppelins loaned by the Confederate government and refurbished by the Draka to fight the Race and New England secessionists, and freed up the the astounding success of Operation: Sea Lion.


Duhh.

Flocculencio
January 25th, 2004, 07:15 AM
The Peshawar Lancers would crush him in any case. ;)

Chris
January 25th, 2004, 02:51 PM
Be sensible.

Rommel would need far more support from Hitler, effectivly postponing Barbarossa for a year, but it could be done. Rommel pushes over Suez and provokes revolts in Iraq and Iran, both of which join the axis. Itaians get the honor of pushing down into africa. Germans push forward into India from Iran.

Chris

carlton_bach
January 25th, 2004, 03:55 PM
Be sensible.

Rommel would need far more support from Hitler, effectivly postponing Barbarossa for a year, but it could be done. Rommel pushes over Suez and provokes revolts in Iraq and Iran, both of which join the axis. Itaians get the honor of pushing down into africa. Germans push forward into India from Iran.

Chris

I think the plan was the other way 'round: German troops secure Egypt, then wait in place until Barbarossa cores and quarters the Soviet Union and joins up with the Wehrmacht troops moving down the Caucasus to Iran. THe expectation was that Iran could be moved at least to a friendly neutrality while the Arab puppet regimes would support the Germans after British control was removed. Then, the Heeresgruppe Sued and the Afrikakorps could cross the Hindukush to meet their Japanese allies for the handshake in Delhi.

Mind you, he was a megalomaniac. But I guess on a map it looks feasible.

gianluca790
March 4th, 2007, 07:44 PM
No Barbarossa, just the Invasion of the Hindu Kush.

Max Sinister
March 4th, 2007, 07:54 PM
It would take a lot of time, the German troops would suffer from overstretching and long support ways, and you could never know whether Stalin would feel threatened / see the opportunity and attack first.

Besides, Hitler wanted to bring down Russia first.

Prinz Richard Eugen
March 4th, 2007, 08:52 PM
Hitler invade India - the homeland of the Aryans???

cra0422
March 4th, 2007, 09:41 PM
While I agree it was feasible on a map and Hitler's long-term plans were to link up with the Japanese in India, there are some problems with this.


Hitler's main territorial desires lay in the conquest of Russia, so Barbarossa got most of the men & material.
Japan was more focussed on subduing China and holding their gains in the Pacific. Remember, they kept hoping for a negotiated settlement with the Allies. They did launch one attempt at invading India, but it was a complete disaster.
The British would throw everything they had into defending India, its "Jewel in the Crown".
While gaining the oil-rich Middle East would ease some of the strain off of Germany's war production, remember the economy was never put on a proper war function.
Sooner or later, Germany would outrun it's supply lines. It had no real surface fleet or any real type of supply fleet. Even with the Suez under their control, they didn't have enough ships or transports to resupply an invasion of India.There are some other reasons why invading India wasn't possible. But remember this above all: Germany did not have the means to fight a long-term war. Blitzkrieg works great on your neighbors, but not so well on a place thousands of miles away.

Larrikin
March 5th, 2007, 01:04 AM
People tend to forget two things when they are talking about a massive German push through North Africa.

1. The Italian merchant fleet was reduced in size by a significant amount when Big Benny declared war, because lots of it was out of the Med and very promptly interned, therefore it would have struggled to provide the ship tonnage need to supply a bigger effort

2. There is a natural unflankable defensive position in Egypt, it was the site of the Alamein battles. If the Brits fort that up early on (mid 41) they aren't pissing away troops and materiel in mobile battles, but rather the Germans are having to frontally assault the best defensive troops in the world in dug in pre-prepared positions. Remember that Winnie was reading Adolf's mail, and all those tanks, planes etc that were sent to Russia, or retained in England, would have gone to the ME, along with guns, troops, etc. Blitzkreig would not have worked, and so the whole point becomes moot.

People tend to forget that if major changes happen in one place, they tend to get matched by major changes in others.

Wendell
March 5th, 2007, 01:06 AM
No Barbarossa, just the Invasion of the Hindu Kush.

Bumping numerous dead threads is a good way to get oneself banned.

Electric Monk
March 5th, 2007, 01:29 AM
I think bumping old threads is fine if one has an actual substantive contribution to make (or maybe making a new thread and linking to the old[er] ones) but yeah, one line bumps are bad™.

As for the premise I always liked the Turtledove story where the Nazi's are running India and Gandhi just gets shot because peaceful non-resistance only works against someone unwilling to shoot. Although he writes good stories and one-off novels, he should never write series.


I think the logistical problems are huge (even without Barbarossa) and may in fact require Turkey to be Axis for the rail line.

I'm assuming SuperHitler of course, the one where he puts the economy on a war footing and isn't insane. Even then, its iffy.

Homer
March 5th, 2007, 03:15 PM
I think the logistical problems are huge (even without Barbarossa) and may in fact require Turkey to be Axis for the rail line.

I'm assuming SuperHitler of course, the one where he puts the economy on a war footing and isn't insane. Even then, its iffy.

I think the war would be over long before the Nazis reach India:

If they attack Russia, the same would happen as OTL.

If they do not attack Russia (which would require a significantly different Hitler, yet no implausible TL) but concentrate on the "mediterranean strategy", they might conquer Suez and the Arabian countries, and then the war with Britain should be over. The Suez channel was significant for the Empire, and ITTL the Germans would not only have the channel but also more than enoguh supplies.

In this case Turkey wouldn't necessarily be Axis. Even a neutral country can agree to let oil transports of a country that controls pretty much all neighbouring countries besides that communist state cross.

Wozza
March 5th, 2007, 04:21 PM
Be sensible.

Rommel would need far more support from Hitler, effectivly postponing Barbarossa for a year, but it could be done. Rommel pushes over Suez and provokes revolts in Iraq and Iran, both of which join the axis. Itaians get the honor of pushing down into africa. Germans push forward into India from Iran.

Chris

Unfortunately the supply line in Africa could only take 4 divisions. Making any support of main push via Libya practically impossible. Even once Egypt is seized the problems are legion.
The Sinai will have to be crossed, or shipping into Syria arranged. These forces will then have to cross a large desert into Mesopotamia. Before going against the supply grain into mountains into Iran.

Rommel might have a panzer corps poised on the eastern Iranian border just in time to join the first India-Pakistan war.

Bmao
March 5th, 2007, 04:55 PM
For the Germans to get to India, it would also require a more substantial effort by the Japanese, meaning that the resources they would have used to attack the United STates would be used against Britain instead. Without a war with the US to worry about, the Japanese could conceivably mount a strong thrust into eastern India, with the German's pushing west.

So if both Germany and Japan committed their a greater deal of their resources into attacking India, then if they are really lucky, they could do it. Again, it would also require a mass-uprising against the British by both the Arabs and the Indians.

Of course, there's the problem of the Soviets invading Germany should the Germans hold off on Barbarossa, but that's a whole different thread.

fortyseven
March 5th, 2007, 09:28 PM
Rommel might have a panzer corps poised on the eastern Iranian border just in time to join the first India-Pakistan war.

Funny Wozza

Calgacus
March 5th, 2007, 09:54 PM
Unfortunately the supply line in Africa could only take 4 divisions. Making any support of main push via Libya practically impossible. Even once Egypt is seized the problems are legion.
The Sinai will have to be crossed, or shipping into Syria arranged. These forces will then have to cross a large desert into Mesopotamia. Before going against the supply grain into mountains into Iran.

Rommel might have a panzer corps poised on the eastern Iranian border just in time to join the first India-Pakistan war.

With Egypt seized, they would also have to clear the British from the Med, whcih would take a while, possibly. An alternative might be the 'Fuhrer versus Abdul' scenario, with Germany invading or forcing an alliance with Turkey, and going after India from that route. However I think Stalin would react to that. In fact the Soviets would think a German attack on India was a dream come true - a substantial number of divisions at the end of a very long supply line a long way from Russia's centre. They could invade into Persia or Turkey and chop up the Germans, or simply go straight for Berlin.

Wozza
March 6th, 2007, 08:01 AM
Funny Wozza

I do try:p

Wozza
March 6th, 2007, 08:02 AM
With Egypt seized, they would also have to clear the British from the Med, whcih would take a while, possibly. An alternative might be the 'Fuhrer versus Abdul' scenario, with Germany invading or forcing an alliance with Turkey, and going after India from that route. However I think Stalin would react to that. In fact the Soviets would think a German attack on India was a dream come true - a substantial number of divisions at the end of a very long supply line a long way from Russia's centre. They could invade into Persia or Turkey and chop up the Germans, or simply go straight for Berlin.

Fuhrer vs Abdul!

Strangely enough I was thinking of something similar last night.

gianluca790
March 6th, 2007, 03:28 PM
As for the premise I always liked the Turtledove story where the Nazi's are running India and Gandhi just gets shot because peaceful non-resistance only works against someone unwilling to shoot. Although he writes good stories and one-off novels, he should never write series.

Support for Hitler = Allies for India against Imperialists in Great Britain. Ghandi is not going to be able to employ Non-Violent Resistence against the Nazis. We all know how reasonable the German Army would be in this scenario. It would be better if the Indians joined the Japanese in the Pacific Theatre of the Axis against the Chinese minions of the British Empire in Sutheast Asia. Pakistan would lead the Arab allies of the Axis in an attack on the heart of the Jewish homelands. The Germans did respect the idea of the Indo-Aryans being their ancestors, after all. Perhaps Ghandi might be persuaded to join forces with the Germans, in exchange for a more or less conciliatory attitude.

The Gunslinger
March 8th, 2007, 05:55 AM
I always thought that if Hitler wins in North Africa, he'd head north through the mid east, force Turkey to join and make another assault on the USSR.

Broz
March 27th, 2008, 07:43 AM
ok the idea is a bit silly but its still a interesting question why the axis didnt make a more determined effort to take the midlle east and-or north africa

also when talking about india the fact that japanese armed local anti-british resistance existed opens up a whole range of posibilities
imagine the japanese starting a independence war in india?

Flocculencio
March 27th, 2008, 08:14 AM
Support for Hitler = Allies for India against Imperialists in Great Britain. Ghandi is not going to be able to employ Non-Violent Resistence against the Nazis. We all know how reasonable the German Army would be in this scenario. It would be better if the Indians joined the Japanese in the Pacific Theatre of the Axis against the Chinese minions of the British Empire in Sutheast Asia. Pakistan would lead the Arab allies of the Axis in an attack on the heart of the Jewish homelands. The Germans did respect the idea of the Indo-Aryans being their ancestors, after all. Perhaps Ghandi might be persuaded to join forces with the Germans, in exchange for a more or less conciliatory attitude.

This being the Pakistan that didn't exist until 1947?

Gandhi would never join forces with the Nazis- he detested everything Hitler stood for and even agreed to stop acting against the Raj for the duration of the War as he felt that the fate of the world depended on defeating Hitler.

The man you're looking for is Subhas Chandra Bose. Bose was a rather nasty Fascist who led the Indian National Army, made up of Indian POWs of the Japanese who agreed to fight for the Axis (not that many joined up in any event). Modern Indian revisionist historians have cast him as a national hero for the purposes of developing Indian nationalism (in the same way they recat the Indian Mutiny as some nonsensical "First War of Independence")- this is fair enough in the context of building a national mythology to prevent the diverse ethnic groups of India from fighting each other but unfortunately it's led to the survival of a distasteful undercurrent of Fascism in the Hindutva nationalist movement.

Assuming a Nazi victory, I doubt the Nazis would actually invade India- it would probably be given "independence" as an "ally" (read client state) of the Reich. In fact, it would probably recieve lots of German aid and funding as the Reich's "Aryan ally" in Asia. India would probably be counted on to keep Japan pinned down on Germany's behalf in any Axis-victory TL Cold War.

Broz
March 28th, 2008, 04:45 PM
olnly problem is india i huge
logistics would be a bitch and the huge population etnicly diverse would be dificult to controll
the most probbable outcome would be a split up into an "arian state" a japanese colony and a lot of smaller enclaves loial to the british or autonomus

CalBear
March 28th, 2008, 06:02 PM
Short answer: They get their ass kick.

Long asnwer: The Wehrmacht get's its collective ass kicked up between it's shoulders.

adam888
March 29th, 2008, 04:03 AM
When the Germans signed their alliance with Japan, it was agreed
India would be within the Japanese sphere of influence. There
would be no reason for the Germans to invade India.

Elidor
March 29th, 2008, 06:15 AM
Well this is pretty ASB, so I even created a thread about it in the ASB forums.

I doubt the Nazis would consider Indians as Aryans, seeing that they are all fairly dark-skinned, Nazis if they controlled India, would commit untold atrocities on the Indian people. They won't be slaughtered as the Jews, but they will be pretty much fucked.