Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old July 26th, 2012, 10:13 AM
Simreeve Simreeve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thande View Post
An oft-made claim (now thought to be somewhat exaggerated, but still rooted in reality) is that there are less than 20 words in English that are Celtic imports. Mostly they describe geographic things that the Anglo-Saxons weren't already familiar with (being from Flatland) such as "crag" and "cairn".
Does that only count words that entered English directly from the various Celtic languages?
Some of the 'French' words that came over here, such as "mutton", are actually Celtic (Gallic to be precise) in origin.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by VidaLaVida View Post
Of course, "more mentally stable than Ivan The Terrible" is not exactly an accomplishment.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old July 26th, 2012, 10:33 AM
FleetMac FleetMac is offline
Southron Progressive Geek
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ye Olde Dominion
Posts: 641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simreeve View Post
Does that only count words that entered English directly from the various Celtic languages?
Some of the 'French' words that came over here, such as "mutton", are actually Celtic (Gallic to be precise) in origin.
Probably; otherwise, the percentage of Germanic vocabulary words would jump by a substantial amount due to use of French words derived from the languages of either the Frankish tribes or (more significantly) the Norsemen who were the ancestors of the Normans.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old July 26th, 2012, 12:13 PM
The Professor The Professor is offline
Velleous TL writer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Republic of Beerhaven
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by FleetMac View Post

The Professor-

How do you think the fricative sounds of *English will evolve? Will we see a loss of certain phonemes as IOTL, or will they be preserved?
Which ones since I believe I already mentioned them?
__________________
Bananas shall rise again!
# # #
Henry's Revenge:Legacy of the Angevins
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old July 26th, 2012, 01:21 PM
altwere altwere is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 756
I think that it is the sound that was spelled as gh in the middle of words and is currently spelled as ch in german and is still found in Scottish as in the ch in Loch. I'm not sure when it was last in standard English, but I would guess that it was sometime during the 1500's.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old July 26th, 2012, 08:31 PM
FleetMac FleetMac is offline
Southron Progressive Geek
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ye Olde Dominion
Posts: 641
Quote:
Originally Posted by altwere View Post
I think that it is the sound that was spelled as gh in the middle of words and is currently spelled as ch in german and is still found in Scottish as in the ch in Loch. I'm not sure when it was last in standard English, but I would guess that it was sometime during the 1500's.
Pretty much; whether the [ɣ], [x] or [ç] phonemes have been preserved, and in what form (spelling and grammar wise). As for its loss in OTL English, I blame the writers of Shakespeare's era.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old July 27th, 2012, 12:37 PM
The Professor The Professor is offline
Velleous TL writer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Republic of Beerhaven
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by FleetMac View Post
Pretty much; whether the [ɣ], [x] or [ç] phonemes have been preserved, and in what form (spelling and grammar wise). As for its loss in OTL English, I blame the writers of Shakespeare's era.
Ah,

Well palatal-c I see as mostly developing into "tch" as OTL and being transcribed Č č. It will also likely have a similar diffentiation between words of the same root: speak, speech etc. I say similar as Frisian has developed that way as has some parts of Dutch (cf -tje and -kje)

Similarly CG will become "dge" or G - Ğ ğ

Internal [x] I see as being assimilated to H. There are already some signs of it in the dialectal spellings of night (nigt, niht) etc. How it is pronounced could a local issue.
__________________
Bananas shall rise again!
# # #
Henry's Revenge:Legacy of the Angevins
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old July 27th, 2012, 02:37 PM
FleetMac FleetMac is offline
Southron Progressive Geek
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ye Olde Dominion
Posts: 641
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
Ah,

Well palatal-c I see as mostly developing into "tch" as OTL and being transcribed Č č. It will also likely have a similar diffentiation between words of the same root: speak, speech etc. I say similar as Frisian has developed that way as has some parts of Dutch (cf -tje and -kje).
Any reason why "Č č" in particular? I'm merely not aware whether it was an English invention, or imported from the mainland. Other than that, I'm in agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
Internal [x] I see as being assimilated to H. There are already some signs of it in the dialectal spellings of night (nigt, niht) etc. How it is pronounced could a local issue.
TBH I imagine it'd end up adopting similar conventions to that used in Lallans/Scots; placement within the word determining the pronunciation, and whether it's adjacent to certain consonants (hw-, hr-, etc.)
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old July 29th, 2012, 05:00 PM
TaylorS TaylorS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts: 349
The English "ch" sound is actually an innovation shared between English and Frisian that developed around AD 700

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Frisian_languages

Proto-West-Germanic *ik* "I" becomes:

/ɪʧ/ > /iː/ > /aɪ/ in English
/ɪk/ in Low German
/ɪx/ > /ɪç/ in High German (then /ɪʃ/ in some dialects)

English "cheese" vs. High German "Käse"
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old July 29th, 2012, 08:37 PM
Shogun Shogun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In your mind
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuvarq View Post
As a place to attack or a place to ignore?
To ignore.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old July 29th, 2012, 09:07 PM
Kidblast Kidblast is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Æsir View Post
Perhaps one could look at West Frisian (English's closest living relative on the continent) for how it would turn out. For example, in this clip (Allegedly a shibboleth used by Frisian freedom fighter Pier Gerlofs Donia to distinguish Frisian captives from Dutch and German ones), mostly the first part, you can tell how close the languages are even today. IIRC it's said that Frisian and English mariners on the North Sea found each other's language mutually intelligible into the 19th century.
Butter, bread and green cheese, who can't say them is against the Fries?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamsodonnell View Post
Game over then! The Byzantines had Greek Fire to defend them, the Golden Dawn just has hot air
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old July 29th, 2012, 09:17 PM
Umbric Man Umbric Man is offline
That's Who I Am!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: City of Washington
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to Umbric Man
The first part, talking of the foods...CHRIST, say just that and I'd assume the Frisian spoke fluent English!
__________________
On the whole, I'd rather be in Chicago.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old July 30th, 2012, 10:43 AM
altwere altwere is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 756
In an Anglo-Dutch timeline would Friis be concidered an English dialect?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old July 30th, 2012, 03:08 PM
The Professor The Professor is offline
Velleous TL writer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Republic of Beerhaven
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by FleetMac View Post
Any reason why "Č č" in particular? I'm merely not aware whether it was an English invention, or imported from the mainland. Other than that, I'm in agreement.
I see it as evolving from a "superscript"-e over c later becoming more crownlike as it develops and then becoming associated with the similar Eastern European version.
Basically similar to how the umlaut evolved - in fact a plausible alternative would be c-umlaut.

(admittedly I just chose it initially for simplicity and that it looks less French )


Quote:
Originally Posted by FleetMac View Post
TBH I imagine it'd end up adopting similar conventions to that used in Lallans/Scots; placement within the word determining the pronunciation, and whether it's adjacent to certain consonants (hw-, hr-, etc.)
Hmm yes.
__________________
Bananas shall rise again!
# # #
Henry's Revenge:Legacy of the Angevins
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old July 31st, 2012, 03:48 PM
TaylorS TaylorS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Umbric Man View Post
The first part, talking of the foods...CHRIST, say just that and I'd assume the Frisian spoke fluent English!
Were it not for English's re-lexification with Old French words we would be able to understand Frisian very easily. It's really creepy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.