Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 29th, 2012, 02:20 AM
Hairog Hairog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
WWIII 1946 Weapons Development

It has been suggested that we have a thread on the different weapons systems the protagonists might employ in WWIII May 1946.

I look forward to some good discussions on small arms, wonder weapons and tanks.

Let's all be nice please.
__________________
Check the World War III 1946 Blog at ... www.wwiii1946.blogspot.com

Ebook available soon. Contact:
gogebic36@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 29th, 2012, 09:07 AM
Life In Black Life In Black is offline
Kicked
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: On the frontlines of Pennsylvania...
Posts: 1000 or more
Paging RangerElite.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petike View Post
Some people need Deloreans with flux capacitors, I was content with installing my FC into an old Škoda...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 29th, 2012, 09:24 AM
BriefMortal BriefMortal is offline
No, this is Patrick
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Devana, Caledonia Province
Posts: 472
More heavy tanks. A lot more.
__________________
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 29th, 2012, 09:28 AM
NickBana NickBana is offline
-User Title Error-
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kingdom of Sarawak
Posts: 390
Talking YEAHHHH!!!!

I see that the Allies will started to develop small arms with intermediate cartridge. So, M-14 will butterflied away I think... FN-FAL maybe uses a smaller cartridges...

The Soviet will field SKS first(assuming the field test for AK-47 was still running)... Then slowly move towards AK-47 (AKM because the production was more efficient)...

EDIT: Subscribed.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. BoJangles View Post
Trust me, if the north comes running, I'll get my dorm to start cumming. And when they're retreating, I'll be throwing.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 29th, 2012, 10:16 AM
Xavier Xavier is offline
Imperator Belgicus
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Antwerp, Low Countries
Posts: 698
Actually, I doubt that they will develop a new cartridge in those circumstances, not while still having mountains of leftover arms & ammo from WWII.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 29th, 2012, 01:22 PM
NHBL NHBL is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Some possibilities...

I'm assuming a POD after VE day, and that the war is Allies vs USSR, so naval tech may suffer some. Nautilis and the like will become a lesser priority, since the seas are an Allied lake.

Anti-radiation gear for soldiers becomes a priority for the troops, since nuclear weapons are available--though might be hard to get in on a Red Air Force that knows what they are.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 29th, 2012, 01:46 PM
wietze wietze is offline
Figment of my own Imagination
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Just south of Frisian Islands
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickBana View Post
I see that the Allies will started to develop small arms with intermediate cartridge. So, M-14 will butterflied away I think... FN-FAL maybe uses a smaller cartridges...
you mean the like the british EM-2 rifle with the .280 cartridge?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EM-2_rifle
__________________
- AH.com where every writer is better than harry harrison -
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 29th, 2012, 01:53 PM
RangerElite RangerElite is offline
Leading The Way Since 1992
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Posts: 148
Comment

Quote:
Originally Posted by wietze View Post
you mean the like the british EM-2 rifle with the .280 cartridge?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EM-2_rifle
That, and whatever else we can think of.
__________________
- It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence. Mohandas Gandhi
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 29th, 2012, 10:14 PM
Hipsterredneck556 Hipsterredneck556 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickBana View Post
I see that the Allies will started to develop small arms with intermediate cartridge. So, M-14 will butterflied away I think... FN-FAL maybe uses a smaller cartridges...

The Soviet will field SKS first(assuming the field test for AK-47 was still running)... Then slowly move towards AK-47 (AKM because the production was more efficient)...

EDIT: Subscribed.
The US is not going to adopt an intermediate cartridge. We were the single biggest obstacle to the adoption of the .280 as a NATO standard round. Unless there is a immense shift in thinking by the US military, any american rifle will be in .30-06.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 30th, 2012, 03:56 AM
NickBana NickBana is offline
-User Title Error-
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kingdom of Sarawak
Posts: 390
Wink I know...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hipsterredneck556 View Post
The US is not going to adopt an intermediate cartridge. We were the single biggest obstacle to the adoption of the .280 as a NATO standard round. Unless there is a immense shift in thinking by the US military, any american rifle will be in .30-06.
I know, thats why Hairog seems irritated by the debate about it in his timeline(sorry, mate)...

Look, the Allies had seen first hand the effectiveness of the first assault rifle fielded(StG 44), how if the Reds develop the similar weapon? they must develop it, if not they will risk lagging behind or suffer disadvantages(and heavy casualties) when encountering the Soviet. Mr. K's weapon must be already be in final stages of test before the attack...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. BoJangles View Post
Trust me, if the north comes running, I'll get my dorm to start cumming. And when they're retreating, I'll be throwing.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old May 29th, 2012, 01:39 PM
RangerElite RangerElite is offline
Leading The Way Since 1992
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Posts: 148
Comment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Life In Black View Post
Paging RangerElite.
I'm home, Life and Nick Thanks Hairog
__________________
- It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence. Mohandas Gandhi
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old May 29th, 2012, 02:10 PM
Shtudmuffin Shtudmuffin is offline
Emperor of Occitania-Aragon
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 810
I'm going to assume a lot of weapons might be taken from the Germans. So we might see Allied use of the StG 44 or a derivative. Maybe the Panther/Tiger tank production lines will be back up and running. The V2 or a variant will likely see some action. A lot of unfinished Nazi projects might see completion. Perhaps even remnants of the German Army itself (PoW's and other remaining forces) will be mobilized. Also, we might see an earlier development of MBTs (Centurions in the UK, [something else, maybe Pershings?] in the US, and T-54s in the USSR).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old May 29th, 2012, 02:46 PM
RangerElite RangerElite is offline
Leading The Way Since 1992
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shtudmuffin View Post
I'm going to assume a lot of weapons might be taken from the Germans. So we might see Allied use of the StG 44 or a derivative. Maybe the Panther/Tiger tank production lines will be back up and running. The V2 or a variant will likely see some action. A lot of unfinished Nazi projects might see completion. Perhaps even remnants of the German Army itself (PoW's and other remaining forces) will be mobilized. Also, we might see an earlier development of MBTs (Centurions in the UK, [something else, maybe Pershings?] in the US, and T-54s in the USSR).
Well, some of the stuff has already been realized, and a lot of the weapons developments in this timeline does stem from captured German weapons and some of the scientists behind them. ITTL, the M26 Pershing has been fielded, and found extremely wanting, so much so, that US licensed a copy, up-gunned and turret redesigned, of the British Centurion tank, entering US service as the M50 Patton. There has been a weapons trial of several systems, such as an American version of the StG44, designed by former Mauser and FN designers and using a "kurz" .30-'06 cartridge, and of a multiple launch rocket system that delivers payloads of sub-munitions and napalm onto the battlefield, an improved air-deliverable up-gunned version of the M38 Wolfhound armored car, and the list goes on. You should read the original story, from start to finish, it's a great read
__________________
- It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence. Mohandas Gandhi
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old May 29th, 2012, 03:58 PM
Sior Sior is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1000 or more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattress_(rocket)




A British Staghound mounting eight 5 inch Land Mattress artillery rockets.

Close artillery support
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old June 1st, 2012, 03:25 AM
Starkad Starkad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shtudmuffin View Post
I'm going to assume a lot of weapons might be taken from the Germans. So we might see Allied use of the StG 44 or a derivative. Maybe the Panther/Tiger tank production lines will be back up and running. The V2 or a variant will likely see some action. A lot of unfinished Nazi projects might see completion. Perhaps even remnants of the German Army itself (PoW's and other remaining forces) will be mobilized. Also, we might see an earlier development of MBTs (Centurions in the UK, [something else, maybe Pershings?] in the US, and T-54s in the USSR).
Well, the point is the west allies in '45 very much did not want Germany to EVER have a weapons industry again. Thus following the big surrenders in may '45 almost all captured german weapons were destroyed, much to the chagrin of the governments of the newly liberated countries trying to rebuild armies of their own.
I rather doubt that any arms industry worthy of the name would be left in Germany at the end of '45

The soviets were less concerned, and IIRC some of the lesser WAPA countries had stuff like SdKfz 251's in service through the '70...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old June 24th, 2012, 03:17 AM
Ziomatrix Ziomatrix is offline
AH Outsider
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 184
Pick up where left off

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shtudmuffin View Post
So we might see Allied use of the StG 44 or a derivative. Maybe the Panther/Tiger tank production lines will be back up and running.
Why not something more directly based on a more modular prototype which the US already had their hands on in Aberdeen. Besides small and medium arms, I don't see anyone rebuilding bombed out facilities to build complicated tanks when domestic industries would be at full capacity or further gearing up to turn out current and domestically upgraded vehicles in increasing capacity. At least as far as the US there could be some interesting developments in conjunction with an over abundance of B-17 and other obsolete aircraft in the form of furthering unmanned flight.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old May 29th, 2012, 04:23 PM
Xavier Xavier is offline
Imperator Belgicus
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Antwerp, Low Countries
Posts: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairog View Post
It has been suggested that we have a thread on the different weapons systems the protagonists might employ in WWIII May 1946.

I look forward to some good discussions on small arms, wonder weapons and tanks.

Let's all be nice please.
Say, what's your POD and how is the run-up to WWIII in may '46?

Also, the white on black of your blog is seriously hurting my eyes.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old May 29th, 2012, 04:35 PM
NickBana NickBana is offline
-User Title Error-
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kingdom of Sarawak
Posts: 390
Question Hm?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xavier View Post
Say, what's your POD and how is the run-up to WWIII in may '46?

Also, the white on black of your blog is seriously hurting my eyes.
The POD was around 1920 something... The condemned people in the Gulag system were given another chance working with Sergo, personal aide of Stalin...

EDIT: Can someone identify what rifle is this? Looks like M1 Carbine, though...

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. BoJangles View Post
Trust me, if the north comes running, I'll get my dorm to start cumming. And when they're retreating, I'll be throwing.

Last edited by NickBana; May 29th, 2012 at 06:16 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old May 29th, 2012, 06:27 PM
RangerElite RangerElite is offline
Leading The Way Since 1992
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickBana View Post
The POD was around 1920 something... The condemned people in the Gulag system were given another chance working with Sergo, personal aide of Stalin...

EDIT: Can someone identify what rifle is this? Looks like M1 Carbine, though...

That's a Ruger Mini-14, Ruger Arms interpretation of the M-14 in .223/5.56mm caliber
__________________
- It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence. Mohandas Gandhi
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old May 29th, 2012, 06:32 PM
RangerElite RangerElite is offline
Leading The Way Since 1992
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Posts: 148
Slight Correction

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickBana View Post
The POD was around 1920 something... The condemned people in the Gulag system were given another chance working with Sergo, personal aide of Stalin...
Actually, if you read the story from the beginning, the POD turns out to be in 1943, when Stalin is introduced to Sergo Peshkov for the very first time. Sergo is actually an aviation and rocketry genius, and somewhat of a savant and completely devoid of guile, seeing things with a child's eye and wonder. This is why Stalin values him so much.
__________________
- It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence. Mohandas Gandhi

Last edited by RangerElite; May 29th, 2012 at 07:16 PM.. Reason: addition
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.